1990 Mercury Tracer vs. 2005 Ford Ecosport
To start off, 2005 Ford Ecosport is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1990 Mercury Tracer. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1990 Mercury Tracer would be higher. At 1,986 cc (4 cylinders), 1990 Mercury Tracer is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1990 Mercury Tracer (109 HP) has 15 more horse power than 2005 Ford Ecosport. (94 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1990 Mercury Tracer should accelerate faster than 2005 Ford Ecosport.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1990 Mercury Tracer | 2005 Ford Ecosport | |
Make | Mercury | Ford |
Model | Tracer | Ecosport |
Year Released | 1990 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1986 cc | 1000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 109 HP | 94 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Length | 4350 mm | 4228 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1980 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1679 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2510 mm | 2490 mm |