1990 Mercury Tracer vs. 2009 Holden UTE
To start off, 2009 Holden UTE is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1990 Mercury Tracer. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1990 Mercury Tracer would be higher. At 6,000 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 Holden UTE is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Holden UTE (357 HP) has 230 more horse power than 1990 Mercury Tracer. (127 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Holden UTE should accelerate faster than 1990 Mercury Tracer.
Because 2009 Holden UTE is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2009 Holden UTE. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1990 Mercury Tracer, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Holden UTE (530 Nm) has 376 more torque (in Nm) than 1990 Mercury Tracer. (154 Nm). This means 2009 Holden UTE will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1990 Mercury Tracer.
Compare all specifications:
| 1990 Mercury Tracer | 2009 Holden UTE | |
| Make | Mercury | Holden |
| Model | Tracer | UTE |
| Year Released | 1990 | 2009 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1839 cc | 6000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 127 HP | 357 HP |
| Torque | 154 Nm | 530 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
