1990 Mercury Tracer vs. 2010 Holden Colorado
To start off, 2010 Holden Colorado is newer by 20 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1990 Mercury Tracer. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1990 Mercury Tracer would be higher. At 2,400 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Holden Colorado is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Holden Colorado (123 HP) has 35 more horse power than 1990 Mercury Tracer. (88 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Holden Colorado should accelerate faster than 1990 Mercury Tracer.
Because 2010 Holden Colorado is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2010 Holden Colorado. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1990 Mercury Tracer, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Holden Colorado (207 Nm) has 61 more torque (in Nm) than 1990 Mercury Tracer. (146 Nm). This means 2010 Holden Colorado will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1990 Mercury Tracer.
Compare all specifications:
| 1990 Mercury Tracer | 2010 Holden Colorado | |
| Make | Mercury | Holden |
| Model | Tracer | Colorado |
| Year Released | 1990 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1859 cc | 2400 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 88 HP | 123 HP |
| Torque | 146 Nm | 207 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
