1990 Mercury Tracer vs. 2010 Land Rover Range Rover
To start off, 2010 Land Rover Range Rover is newer by 20 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1990 Mercury Tracer. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1990 Mercury Tracer would be higher. At 4,367 cc (8 cylinders), 2010 Land Rover Range Rover is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Land Rover Range Rover (311 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 223 more horse power than 1990 Mercury Tracer. (88 HP @ 4400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Land Rover Range Rover should accelerate faster than 1990 Mercury Tracer.
Because 2010 Land Rover Range Rover is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1990 Mercury Tracer. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Land Rover Range Rover will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Land Rover Range Rover (700 Nm @ 1500 RPM) has 554 more torque (in Nm) than 1990 Mercury Tracer. (146 Nm @ 3800 RPM). This means 2010 Land Rover Range Rover will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1990 Mercury Tracer.
Compare all specifications:
1990 Mercury Tracer | 2010 Land Rover Range Rover | |
Make | Mercury | Land Rover |
Model | Tracer | Range Rover |
Year Released | 1990 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1859 cc | 4367 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 88 HP | 311 HP |
Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 146 Nm | 700 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3800 RPM | 1500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Vehicle Length | 4350 mm | 4973 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 2035 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1877 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2510 mm | 2891 mm |