1990 Mercury Tracer vs. 2011 Honda Fit

To start off, 2011 Honda Fit is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1990 Mercury Tracer. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1990 Mercury Tracer would be higher. At 1,859 cc (4 cylinders), 1990 Mercury Tracer is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Honda Fit (117 HP @ 6600 RPM) has 29 more horse power than 1990 Mercury Tracer. (88 HP @ 4400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Honda Fit should accelerate faster than 1990 Mercury Tracer. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2011 Honda Fit weights approximately 79 kg more than 1990 Mercury Tracer. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1990 Mercury Tracer (146 Nm @ 3800 RPM) has 2 more torque (in Nm) than 2011 Honda Fit. (144 Nm @ 4800 RPM). This means 1990 Mercury Tracer will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2011 Honda Fit.

Compare all specifications:

1990 Mercury Tracer 2011 Honda Fit
Make Mercury Honda
Model Tracer Fit
Year Released 1990 2011
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1859 cc 1500 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 88 HP 117 HP
Engine RPM 4400 RPM 6600 RPM
Torque 146 Nm 144 Nm
Torque RPM 3800 RPM 4800 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Front Front
Vehicle Weight 1050 kg 1129 kg
Vehicle Length 4350 mm 4105 mm
Vehicle Width 1700 mm 1694 mm
Vehicle Height 1350 mm 1524 mm
Wheelbase Size 2510 mm 2499 mm