1990 Mitsubishi Magna vs. 1960 Toyota Master RR
To start off, 1990 Mitsubishi Magna is newer by 30 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Toyota Master RR. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Toyota Master RR would be higher. At 2,555 cc (4 cylinders), 1990 Mitsubishi Magna is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1990 Mitsubishi Magna (114 HP) has 74 more horse power than 1960 Toyota Master RR. (40 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1990 Mitsubishi Magna should accelerate faster than 1960 Toyota Master RR. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1990 Mitsubishi Magna weights approximately 125 kg more than 1960 Toyota Master RR. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1960 Toyota Master RR is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1960 Toyota Master RR. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1990 Mitsubishi Magna, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1990 Mitsubishi Magna | 1960 Toyota Master RR | |
Make | Mitsubishi | Toyota |
Model | Magna | Master RR |
Year Released | 1990 | 1960 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2555 cc | 1453 cc |
Horse Power | 114 HP | 40 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1335 kg | 1210 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4750 mm | 4280 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1680 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1560 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2730 mm | 2540 mm |