1990 Mitsubishi Magna vs. 2012 Ford Ecosport
To start off, 2012 Ford Ecosport is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1990 Mitsubishi Magna. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1990 Mitsubishi Magna would be higher. At 2,555 cc (4 cylinders), 1990 Mitsubishi Magna is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Ford Ecosport (118 HP) has 4 more horse power than 1990 Mitsubishi Magna. (114 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Ford Ecosport should accelerate faster than 1990 Mitsubishi Magna.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1990 Mitsubishi Magna (198 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 28 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Ford Ecosport. (170 Nm @ 1300 RPM). This means 1990 Mitsubishi Magna will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Ford Ecosport.
Compare all specifications:
| 1990 Mitsubishi Magna | 2012 Ford Ecosport | |
| Make | Mitsubishi | Ford |
| Model | Magna | Ecosport |
| Year Released | 1990 | 2012 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2555 cc | 1000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 114 HP | 118 HP |
| Torque | 198 Nm | 170 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 1300 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
