1990 Nissan Bluebird vs. 1965 Seat 600
To start off, 1990 Nissan Bluebird is newer by 25 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Seat 600. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Seat 600 would be higher. At 1,598 cc (4 cylinders), 1990 Nissan Bluebird is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1990 Nissan Bluebird weights approximately 435 kg more than 1965 Seat 600.
Because 1965 Seat 600 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1965 Seat 600. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1990 Nissan Bluebird, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1990 Nissan Bluebird (126 Nm @ 3200 RPM) has 79 more torque (in Nm) than 1965 Seat 600. (47 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 1990 Nissan Bluebird will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1965 Seat 600.
Compare all specifications:
1990 Nissan Bluebird | 1965 Seat 600 | |
Make | Nissan | Seat |
Model | Bluebird | 600 |
Year Released | 1990 | 1965 |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Size | 1598 cc | 767 cc |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 81 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 126 Nm | 47 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3200 RPM | 2500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1010 kg | 575 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4380 mm | 3300 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1390 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1360 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2560 mm | 2010 mm |