1990 Oldsmobile Cutlass vs. 1955 Studebaker Champion
To start off, 1990 Oldsmobile Cutlass is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 Studebaker Champion. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 Studebaker Champion would be higher. At 3,032 cc (8 cylinders), 1955 Studebaker Champion is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1990 Oldsmobile Cutlass (163 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 63 more horse power than 1955 Studebaker Champion. (100 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1990 Oldsmobile Cutlass should accelerate faster than 1955 Studebaker Champion. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1955 Studebaker Champion weights approximately 175 kg more than 1990 Oldsmobile Cutlass.
Because 1955 Studebaker Champion is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1955 Studebaker Champion. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1990 Oldsmobile Cutlass, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1990 Oldsmobile Cutlass | 1955 Studebaker Champion | |
| Make | Oldsmobile | Studebaker |
| Model | Cutlass | Champion |
| Year Released | 1990 | 1955 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1998 cc | 3032 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 163 HP | 100 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1200 kg | 1375 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4550 mm | 5150 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1770 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1530 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2640 mm | 2970 mm |
