1990 Oldsmobile Cutlass vs. 2013 Mazda 3
To start off, 2013 Mazda 3 is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1990 Oldsmobile Cutlass. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1990 Oldsmobile Cutlass would be higher. At 1,999 cc (4 cylinders), 2013 Mazda 3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1990 Oldsmobile Cutlass (163 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 17 more horse power than 2013 Mazda 3. (146 HP @ 6500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1990 Oldsmobile Cutlass should accelerate faster than 2013 Mazda 3. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Mazda 3 weights approximately 100 kg more than 1990 Oldsmobile Cutlass.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1990 Oldsmobile Cutlass (237 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 37 more torque (in Nm) than 2013 Mazda 3. (200 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 1990 Oldsmobile Cutlass will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2013 Mazda 3.
Compare all specifications:
1990 Oldsmobile Cutlass | 2013 Mazda 3 | |
Make | Oldsmobile | Mazda |
Model | Cutlass | 3 |
Year Released | 1990 | 2013 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1998 cc | 1999 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 163 HP | 146 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 6500 RPM |
Torque | 237 Nm | 200 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | 5-speed manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1200 kg | 1300 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4550 mm | 4595 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1755 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1470 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2640 mm | 2640 mm |