1990 Opel Omega vs. 1970 Zastava 1300
To start off, 1990 Opel Omega is newer by 20 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1970 Zastava 1300. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1970 Zastava 1300 would be higher. At 1,998 cc (4 cylinders), 1990 Opel Omega is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1990 Opel Omega (115 HP) has 62 more horse power than 1970 Zastava 1300. (53 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1990 Opel Omega should accelerate faster than 1970 Zastava 1300. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1990 Opel Omega weights approximately 319 kg more than 1970 Zastava 1300. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1990 Opel Omega (169 Nm @ 2600 RPM) has 76 more torque (in Nm) than 1970 Zastava 1300. (93 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 1990 Opel Omega will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1970 Zastava 1300.
Compare all specifications:
1990 Opel Omega | 1970 Zastava 1300 | |
Make | Opel | Zastava |
Model | Omega | 1300 |
Year Released | 1990 | 1970 |
Engine Size | 1998 cc | 1295 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 115 HP | 53 HP |
Torque | 169 Nm | 93 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2600 RPM | 3200 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1299 kg | 980 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4770 mm | 4040 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1550 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1490 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2740 mm | 2430 mm |