1990 Opel Omega vs. 1996 Rover 200
To start off, 1996 Rover 200 is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1990 Opel Omega. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1990 Opel Omega would be higher. At 2,410 cc (4 cylinders), 1990 Opel Omega is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1990 Opel Omega is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1990 Opel Omega. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Rover 200, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1990 Opel Omega | 1996 Rover 200 | |
Make | Opel | Rover |
Model | Omega | 200 |
Year Released | 1990 | 1996 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2410 cc | 1396 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 103 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Length | 4740 mm | 4230 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1490 mm | 1410 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2740 mm | 2510 mm |