1990 Opel Omega vs. 1998 Renault Clio
To start off, 1998 Renault Clio is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1990 Opel Omega. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1990 Opel Omega would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1990 Opel Omega weights approximately 364 kg more than 1998 Renault Clio.
Because 1990 Opel Omega is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1990 Opel Omega. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1998 Renault Clio, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1990 Opel Omega | 1998 Renault Clio | |
Make | Opel | Renault |
Model | Omega | Clio |
Year Released | 1990 | 1998 |
Horse Power | 115 HP | 0 HP |
Top Speed | 182 km/hour | 181 km/hour |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1299 kg | 935 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4770 mm | 3780 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1650 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1490 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2740 mm | 2770 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 70 L | 50 L |