1990 Opel Omega vs. 2004 Renault Clio
To start off, 2004 Renault Clio is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1990 Opel Omega. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1990 Opel Omega would be higher. At 2,594 cc (6 cylinders), 1990 Opel Omega is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1990 Opel Omega (149 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 51 more horse power than 2004 Renault Clio. (98 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1990 Opel Omega should accelerate faster than 2004 Renault Clio. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1990 Opel Omega weights approximately 410 kg more than 2004 Renault Clio. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1990 Opel Omega (224 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 97 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Renault Clio. (127 Nm @ 3750 RPM). This means 1990 Opel Omega will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Renault Clio.
Compare all specifications:
1990 Opel Omega | 2004 Renault Clio | |
Make | Opel | Renault |
Model | Omega | Clio |
Year Released | 1990 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2594 cc | 1390 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 149 HP | 98 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 224 Nm | 127 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 3750 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1465 kg | 1055 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4740 mm | 3780 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1650 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1490 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2740 mm | 2590 mm |