1990 Opel Omega vs. 2004 Toyota Tundra
To start off, 2004 Toyota Tundra is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1990 Opel Omega. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1990 Opel Omega would be higher. At 3,400 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Toyota Tundra is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Toyota Tundra (187 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 38 more horse power than 1990 Opel Omega. (149 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Toyota Tundra should accelerate faster than 1990 Opel Omega. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Toyota Tundra weights approximately 255 kg more than 1990 Opel Omega. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Toyota Tundra (298 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 74 more torque (in Nm) than 1990 Opel Omega. (224 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 2004 Toyota Tundra will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1990 Opel Omega.
Compare all specifications:
| 1990 Opel Omega | 2004 Toyota Tundra | |
| Make | Opel | Toyota |
| Model | Omega | Tundra |
| Year Released | 1990 | 2004 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2594 cc | 3400 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 149 HP | 187 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 4800 RPM |
| Torque | 224 Nm | 298 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 3600 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1465 kg | 1720 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4740 mm | 5530 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1920 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1490 mm | 1800 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2740 mm | 3270 mm |
