1990 Opel Omega vs. 2010 Acura CSX
To start off, 2010 Acura CSX is newer by 20 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1990 Opel Omega. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1990 Opel Omega would be higher. At 2,594 cc (6 cylinders), 1990 Opel Omega is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Acura CSX (155 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 6 more horse power than 1990 Opel Omega. (149 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Acura CSX should accelerate faster than 1990 Opel Omega. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1990 Opel Omega weights approximately 122 kg more than 2010 Acura CSX.
Let's talk about torque, 1990 Opel Omega (224 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 36 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Acura CSX. (188 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 1990 Opel Omega will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Acura CSX.
Compare all specifications:
1990 Opel Omega | 2010 Acura CSX | |
Make | Opel | Acura |
Model | Omega | CSX |
Year Released | 1990 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2594 cc | 2000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 149 HP | 155 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 224 Nm | 188 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1465 kg | 1343 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4740 mm | 4544 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1752 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1490 mm | 1435 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2740 mm | 2700 mm |