1990 Opel Omega vs. 2010 Chevrolet Orlando
To start off, 2010 Chevrolet Orlando is newer by 20 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1990 Opel Omega. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1990 Opel Omega would be higher. At 2,410 cc (4 cylinders), 1990 Opel Omega is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2010 Chevrolet Orlando is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1990 Opel Omega. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Chevrolet Orlando will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2010 Chevrolet Orlando has automatic transmission and 1990 Opel Omega has manual transmission. 1990 Opel Omega will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2010 Chevrolet Orlando will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1990 Opel Omega | 2010 Chevrolet Orlando | |
Make | Opel | Chevrolet |
Model | Omega | Orlando |
Year Released | 1990 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2410 cc | 2384 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 174 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | AWD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Vehicle Length | 4740 mm | 4652 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1836 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1490 mm | 1633 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2740 mm | 2760 mm |