1990 Opel Omega vs. 2011 Honda CR-V
To start off, 2011 Honda CR-V is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1990 Opel Omega. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1990 Opel Omega would be higher. At 2,410 cc (4 cylinders), 1990 Opel Omega is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1990 Opel Omega is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1990 Opel Omega. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 Honda CR-V, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2011 Honda CR-V has automatic transmission and 1990 Opel Omega has manual transmission. 1990 Opel Omega will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2011 Honda CR-V will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1990 Opel Omega | 2011 Honda CR-V | |
Make | Opel | Honda |
Model | Omega | CR-V |
Year Released | 1990 | 2011 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2410 cc | 2400 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 180 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Vehicle Length | 4740 mm | 4554 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1819 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1490 mm | 1679 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2740 mm | 2619 mm |