1990 Plymouth Colt vs. 1961 Volvo 120
To start off, 1990 Plymouth Colt is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1961 Volvo 120. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1961 Volvo 120 would be higher. At 1,582 cc (4 cylinders), 1961 Volvo 120 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1990 Plymouth Colt (81 HP) has 22 more horse power than 1961 Volvo 120. (59 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1990 Plymouth Colt should accelerate faster than 1961 Volvo 120.
Because 1961 Volvo 120 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1961 Volvo 120. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1990 Plymouth Colt, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1990 Plymouth Colt (123 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 8 more torque (in Nm) than 1961 Volvo 120. (115 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 1990 Plymouth Colt will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1961 Volvo 120.
Compare all specifications:
| 1990 Plymouth Colt | 1961 Volvo 120 | |
| Make | Plymouth | Volvo |
| Model | Colt | 120 |
| Year Released | 1990 | 1961 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1468 cc | 1582 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 81 HP | 59 HP |
| Torque | 123 Nm | 115 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 2500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 995 kg | 995 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4040 mm | 4460 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1680 mm | 1620 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1510 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2400 mm | 2610 mm |
