1990 Plymouth Colt vs. 2003 Mazda Premacy

To start off, 2003 Mazda Premacy is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1990 Plymouth Colt. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1990 Plymouth Colt would be higher. At 1,998 cc (4 cylinders), 2003 Mazda Premacy is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Mazda Premacy (134 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 53 more horse power than 1990 Plymouth Colt. (81 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Mazda Premacy should accelerate faster than 1990 Plymouth Colt. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Mazda Premacy weights approximately 390 kg more than 1990 Plymouth Colt. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Mazda Premacy (171 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 48 more torque (in Nm) than 1990 Plymouth Colt. (123 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2003 Mazda Premacy will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1990 Plymouth Colt.

Compare all specifications:

1990 Plymouth Colt 2003 Mazda Premacy
Make Plymouth Mazda
Model Colt Premacy
Year Released 1990 2003
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1468 cc 1998 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 81 HP 134 HP
Engine RPM 5500 RPM 6000 RPM
Torque 123 Nm 171 Nm
Torque RPM 3500 RPM 4500 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline - Premium
Drive Type Front Front
Vehicle Weight 995 kg 1385 kg
Vehicle Length 4040 mm 4350 mm
Vehicle Width 1680 mm 1710 mm
Vehicle Height 1330 mm 1580 mm
Wheelbase Size 2400 mm 2680 mm