1990 Plymouth Colt vs. 2003 Renault Kangoo
To start off, 2003 Renault Kangoo is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1990 Plymouth Colt. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1990 Plymouth Colt would be higher. At 1,783 cc (4 cylinders), 2003 Renault Kangoo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1990 Plymouth Colt (81 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 17 more horse power than 2003 Renault Kangoo. (64 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1990 Plymouth Colt should accelerate faster than 2003 Renault Kangoo.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1990 Plymouth Colt (123 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 5 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Renault Kangoo. (118 Nm @ 2250 RPM). This means 1990 Plymouth Colt will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Renault Kangoo.
Compare all specifications:
1990 Plymouth Colt | 2003 Renault Kangoo | |
Make | Plymouth | Renault |
Model | Colt | Kangoo |
Year Released | 1990 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1468 cc | 1783 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 81 HP | 64 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Torque | 123 Nm | 118 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 2250 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Vehicle Length | 4040 mm | 4060 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1680 mm | 1850 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1850 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2400 mm | 2630 mm |