1990 Plymouth Colt vs. 2003 ZAZ Wagon
To start off, 2003 ZAZ Wagon is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1990 Plymouth Colt. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1990 Plymouth Colt would be higher. At 1,468 cc (4 cylinders), 1990 Plymouth Colt is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1990 Plymouth Colt (81 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 31 more horse power than 2003 ZAZ Wagon. (50 HP @ 5300 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1990 Plymouth Colt should accelerate faster than 2003 ZAZ Wagon. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1990 Plymouth Colt weights approximately 250 kg more than 2003 ZAZ Wagon. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1990 Plymouth Colt | 2003 ZAZ Wagon | |
Make | Plymouth | ZAZ |
Model | Colt | Wagon |
Year Released | 1990 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1468 cc | 1091 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 81 HP | 50 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5300 RPM |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 995 kg | 745 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4040 mm | 3830 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1680 mm | 1570 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1470 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2400 mm | 2330 mm |