1990 Plymouth Colt vs. 2009 Holden Epica
To start off, 2009 Holden Epica is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1990 Plymouth Colt. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1990 Plymouth Colt would be higher. At 2,492 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Holden Epica is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Holden Epica (153 HP) has 72 more horse power than 1990 Plymouth Colt. (81 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Holden Epica should accelerate faster than 1990 Plymouth Colt.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Holden Epica (237 Nm) has 114 more torque (in Nm) than 1990 Plymouth Colt. (123 Nm). This means 2009 Holden Epica will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1990 Plymouth Colt.
Compare all specifications:
1990 Plymouth Colt | 2009 Holden Epica | |
Make | Plymouth | Holden |
Model | Colt | Epica |
Year Released | 1990 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1468 cc | 2492 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 81 HP | 153 HP |
Torque | 123 Nm | 237 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Vehicle Length | 4040 mm | 4805 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1680 mm | 1810 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2400 mm | 2700 mm |