1990 Plymouth Colt vs. 2010 Holden Commodore
To start off, 2010 Holden Commodore is newer by 20 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1990 Plymouth Colt. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1990 Plymouth Colt would be higher. At 5,976 cc (8 cylinders), 2010 Holden Commodore is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Holden Commodore (360 HP) has 279 more horse power than 1990 Plymouth Colt. (81 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Holden Commodore should accelerate faster than 1990 Plymouth Colt.
Because 2010 Holden Commodore is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2010 Holden Commodore. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1990 Plymouth Colt, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Holden Commodore (290 Nm) has 167 more torque (in Nm) than 1990 Plymouth Colt. (123 Nm). This means 2010 Holden Commodore will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1990 Plymouth Colt.
Compare all specifications:
1990 Plymouth Colt | 2010 Holden Commodore | |
Make | Plymouth | Holden |
Model | Colt | Commodore |
Year Released | 1990 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1468 cc | 5976 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 81 HP | 360 HP |
Torque | 123 Nm | 290 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |