1990 Plymouth Sundance vs. 1972 ZIL 114
To start off, 1990 Plymouth Sundance is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 ZIL 114. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 ZIL 114 would be higher. At 6,959 cc (8 cylinders), 1972 ZIL 114 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1972 ZIL 114 (296 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 200 more horse power than 1990 Plymouth Sundance. (96 HP @ 5200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1972 ZIL 114 should accelerate faster than 1990 Plymouth Sundance. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1972 ZIL 114 weights approximately 2000 kg more than 1990 Plymouth Sundance. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1972 ZIL 114 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1972 ZIL 114. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1990 Plymouth Sundance, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1990 Plymouth Sundance | 1972 ZIL 114 | |
| Make | Plymouth | ZIL |
| Model | Sundance | 114 |
| Year Released | 1990 | 1972 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2212 cc | 6959 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 96 HP | 296 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 4400 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1175 kg | 3175 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4370 mm | 6300 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 2080 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2470 mm | 3770 mm |
