1990 Plymouth Sundance vs. 2010 Mercedes-Benz SL
To start off, 2010 Mercedes-Benz SL is newer by 20 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1990 Plymouth Sundance. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1990 Plymouth Sundance would be higher. At 5,512 cc (12 cylinders), 2010 Mercedes-Benz SL is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Mercedes-Benz SL (510 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 414 more horse power than 1990 Plymouth Sundance. (96 HP @ 5200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Mercedes-Benz SL should accelerate faster than 1990 Plymouth Sundance. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Mercedes-Benz SL weights approximately 775 kg more than 1990 Plymouth Sundance. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2010 Mercedes-Benz SL is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2010 Mercedes-Benz SL. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1990 Plymouth Sundance, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1990 Plymouth Sundance | 2010 Mercedes-Benz SL | |
Make | Plymouth | Mercedes-Benz |
Model | Sundance | SL |
Year Released | 1990 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2212 cc | 5512 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 12 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 96 HP | 510 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1175 kg | 1950 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4370 mm | 4540 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1820 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2470 mm | 2570 mm |