1990 Plymouth Sundance vs. 2012 Ford C-Max
To start off, 2012 Ford C-Max is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1990 Plymouth Sundance. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1990 Plymouth Sundance would be higher. At 2,212 cc (4 cylinders), 1990 Plymouth Sundance is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Ford C-Max (150 HP @ 5700 RPM) has 54 more horse power than 1990 Plymouth Sundance. (96 HP @ 5200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Ford C-Max should accelerate faster than 1990 Plymouth Sundance. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Ford C-Max weights approximately 375 kg more than 1990 Plymouth Sundance. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1990 Plymouth Sundance | 2012 Ford C-Max | |
| Make | Plymouth | Ford |
| Model | Sundance | C-Max |
| Year Released | 1990 | 2012 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2212 cc | 1596 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 96 HP | 150 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 5700 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 1175 kg | 1550 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4370 mm | 4520 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1828 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2470 mm | 2788 mm |
