1990 Plymouth Voyager vs. 2012 Mercedes-Benz C

To start off, 2012 Mercedes-Benz C is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1990 Plymouth Voyager. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1990 Plymouth Voyager would be higher. At 2,972 cc (6 cylinders), 1990 Plymouth Voyager is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Mercedes-Benz C (201 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 59 more horse power than 1990 Plymouth Voyager. (142 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Mercedes-Benz C should accelerate faster than 1990 Plymouth Voyager.

Because 2012 Mercedes-Benz C is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2012 Mercedes-Benz C. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1990 Plymouth Voyager, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Mercedes-Benz C (310 Nm @ 2200 RPM) has 75 more torque (in Nm) than 1990 Plymouth Voyager. (235 Nm @ 2800 RPM). This means 2012 Mercedes-Benz C will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1990 Plymouth Voyager.

Compare all specifications:

1990 Plymouth Voyager 2012 Mercedes-Benz C
Make Plymouth Mercedes-Benz
Model Voyager C
Year Released 1990 2012
Body Type Minivan Station Wagon
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 2972 cc 1796 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type V in-line
Horse Power 142 HP 201 HP
Engine RPM 5000 RPM 5500 RPM
Torque 235 Nm 310 Nm
Torque RPM 2800 RPM 2200 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Front Rear
Number of Seats 7 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 5 doors 5 doors
Vehicle Length 4470 mm 4606 mm
Vehicle Width 1840 mm 1770 mm
Vehicle Height 1650 mm 1459 mm
Wheelbase Size 2860 mm 2760 mm