1990 Reliant Scimitar vs. 1983 Zastava 102
To start off, 1990 Reliant Scimitar is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Zastava 102. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Zastava 102 would be higher. At 1,392 cc (4 cylinders), 1990 Reliant Scimitar is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1990 Reliant Scimitar (75 HP) has 26 more horse power than 1983 Zastava 102. (49 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1990 Reliant Scimitar should accelerate faster than 1983 Zastava 102. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1990 Reliant Scimitar weights approximately 70 kg more than 1983 Zastava 102. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1990 Reliant Scimitar (110 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 15 more torque (in Nm) than 1983 Zastava 102. (95 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1990 Reliant Scimitar will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1983 Zastava 102.
Compare all specifications:
| 1990 Reliant Scimitar | 1983 Zastava 102 | |
| Make | Reliant | Zastava |
| Model | Scimitar | 102 |
| Year Released | 1990 | 1983 |
| Engine Size | 1392 cc | 1299 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 75 HP | 49 HP |
| Torque | 110 Nm | 95 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 3000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 840 kg | 770 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3890 mm | 3500 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1590 mm | 1550 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1250 mm | 1340 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2140 mm | 2160 mm |
