1990 Renault Clio vs. 1980 Seat Ritmo
To start off, 1990 Renault Clio is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Seat Ritmo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Seat Ritmo would be higher. At 1,197 cc (4 cylinders), 1980 Seat Ritmo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1980 Seat Ritmo (63 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 15 more horse power than 1990 Renault Clio. (48 HP @ 5250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1980 Seat Ritmo should accelerate faster than 1990 Renault Clio. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1980 Seat Ritmo weights approximately 70 kg more than 1990 Renault Clio. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1980 Seat Ritmo (92 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 11 more torque (in Nm) than 1990 Renault Clio. (81 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 1980 Seat Ritmo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1990 Renault Clio.
Compare all specifications:
1990 Renault Clio | 1980 Seat Ritmo | |
Make | Renault | Seat |
Model | Clio | Ritmo |
Year Released | 1990 | 1980 |
Engine Size | 1108 cc | 1197 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 48 HP | 63 HP |
Engine RPM | 5250 RPM | 5800 RPM |
Torque | 81 Nm | 92 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 810 kg | 880 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3710 mm | 3950 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 1660 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1410 mm |