1990 Renault Clio vs. 2008 Toyota Condor
To start off, 2008 Toyota Condor is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1990 Renault Clio. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1990 Renault Clio would be higher. At 1,812 cc, 2008 Toyota Condor is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Toyota Condor weights approximately 550 kg more than 1990 Renault Clio.
Because 2008 Toyota Condor is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2008 Toyota Condor. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1990 Renault Clio, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Toyota Condor (135 Nm @ 2400 RPM) has 54 more torque (in Nm) than 1990 Renault Clio. (81 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2008 Toyota Condor will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1990 Renault Clio.
Compare all specifications:
1990 Renault Clio | 2008 Toyota Condor | |
Make | Renault | Toyota |
Model | Clio | Condor |
Year Released | 1990 | 2008 |
Engine Size | 1108 cc | 1812 cc |
Horse Power | 48 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 81 Nm | 135 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 2400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 8 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 810 kg | 1360 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3710 mm | 5020 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1770 mm |