1990 Renault Clio vs. 2011 Honda CR-Z
To start off, 2011 Honda CR-Z is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1990 Renault Clio. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1990 Renault Clio would be higher. At 1,500 cc (4 cylinders), 2011 Honda CR-Z is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Honda CR-Z (122 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 74 more horse power than 1990 Renault Clio. (48 HP @ 5250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Honda CR-Z should accelerate faster than 1990 Renault Clio. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2011 Honda CR-Z weights approximately 392 kg more than 1990 Renault Clio. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2011 Honda CR-Z (173 Nm @ 1000 RPM) has 92 more torque (in Nm) than 1990 Renault Clio. (81 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2011 Honda CR-Z will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1990 Renault Clio.
Compare all specifications:
| 1990 Renault Clio | 2011 Honda CR-Z | |
| Make | Renault | Honda |
| Model | Clio | CR-Z |
| Year Released | 1990 | 2011 |
| Body Type | Hatchback | Hatchback |
| Engine Size | 1108 cc | 1500 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 48 HP | 122 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5250 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 81 Nm | 173 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 1000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline / Electric Hybrid |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 3 doors | 3 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 810 kg | 1202 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3710 mm | 4079 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 1740 mm |
