1990 Rover Metro vs. 1965 Sunbeam Tiger
To start off, 1990 Rover Metro is newer by 25 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Sunbeam Tiger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Sunbeam Tiger would be higher. At 4,261 cc (8 cylinders), 1965 Sunbeam Tiger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1965 Sunbeam Tiger (163 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 88 more horse power than 1990 Rover Metro. (75 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1965 Sunbeam Tiger should accelerate faster than 1990 Rover Metro. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1965 Sunbeam Tiger weights approximately 290 kg more than 1990 Rover Metro. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1965 Sunbeam Tiger is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1965 Sunbeam Tiger. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1990 Rover Metro, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1990 Rover Metro | 1965 Sunbeam Tiger | |
Make | Rover | Sunbeam |
Model | Metro | Tiger |
Year Released | 1990 | 1965 |
Engine Size | 1395 cc | 4261 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 75 HP | 163 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 850 kg | 1140 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3530 mm | 3970 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1570 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1310 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2270 mm | 2190 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 36 L | 27 L |