1990 Rover Metro vs. 1996 Subaru Outback
To start off, 1996 Subaru Outback is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1990 Rover Metro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1990 Rover Metro would be higher. At 2,501 cc (4 cylinders), 1996 Subaru Outback is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Subaru Outback (165 HP) has 90 more horse power than 1990 Rover Metro. (75 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1996 Subaru Outback should accelerate faster than 1990 Rover Metro.
Because 1996 Subaru Outback is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1990 Rover Metro. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Subaru Outback will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1996 Subaru Outback (221 Nm) has 104 more torque (in Nm) than 1990 Rover Metro. (117 Nm). This means 1996 Subaru Outback will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1990 Rover Metro.
Compare all specifications:
| 1990 Rover Metro | 1996 Subaru Outback | |
| Make | Rover | Subaru |
| Model | Metro | Outback |
| Year Released | 1990 | 1996 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1395 cc | 2501 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | boxer |
| Horse Power | 75 HP | 165 HP |
| Torque | 117 Nm | 221 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 75 mm | 99.6 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 79 mm | 79 mm |
| Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 3530 mm | 4380 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1710 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1510 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2270 mm | 2530 mm |
