1990 Skoda Rapid R vs. 2003 Toyota Land Cruiser
To start off, 2003 Toyota Land Cruiser is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1990 Skoda Rapid R. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1990 Skoda Rapid R would be higher. At 2,982 cc, 2003 Toyota Land Cruiser is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Toyota Land Cruiser (193 HP) has 131 more horse power than 1990 Skoda Rapid R. (62 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Toyota Land Cruiser should accelerate faster than 1990 Skoda Rapid R. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Toyota Land Cruiser weights approximately 94 kg more than 1990 Skoda Rapid R. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2003 Toyota Land Cruiser is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1990 Skoda Rapid R. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Toyota Land Cruiser will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Toyota Land Cruiser (280 Nm) has 181 more torque (in Nm) than 1990 Skoda Rapid R. (99 Nm). This means 2003 Toyota Land Cruiser will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1990 Skoda Rapid R.
Compare all specifications:
| 1990 Skoda Rapid R | 2003 Toyota Land Cruiser | |
| Make | Skoda | Toyota |
| Model | Rapid R | Land Cruiser |
| Year Released | 1990 | 2003 |
| Engine Position | Rear | Front |
| Engine Size | 1289 cc | 2982 cc |
| Horse Power | 62 HP | 193 HP |
| Torque | 99 Nm | 280 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Vehicle Weight | 850 kg | 944 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 2670 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 47 L | 87 L |
