1990 Skoda Rapid R vs. 2008 Toyota Condor
To start off, 2008 Toyota Condor is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1990 Skoda Rapid R. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1990 Skoda Rapid R would be higher. At 1,998 cc, 2008 Toyota Condor is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Toyota Condor weights approximately 596 kg more than 1990 Skoda Rapid R.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Toyota Condor (158 Nm @ 2800 RPM) has 59 more torque (in Nm) than 1990 Skoda Rapid R. (99 Nm @ 2850 RPM). This means 2008 Toyota Condor will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1990 Skoda Rapid R.
Compare all specifications:
| 1990 Skoda Rapid R | 2008 Toyota Condor | |
| Make | Skoda | Toyota |
| Model | Rapid R | Condor |
| Year Released | 1990 | 2008 |
| Engine Position | Rear | Front |
| Engine Size | 1289 cc | 1998 cc |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 62 HP | 0 HP |
| Torque | 99 Nm | 158 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2850 RPM | 2800 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 75.5 mm | 86.1 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 72 mm | 86 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 9.7:1 | 8.8:1 |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 8 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 850 kg | 1446 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4170 mm | 4790 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1770 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 2660 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 47 L | 70 L |
