1990 Toyota Lite Ace vs. 2004 Volkswagen Golf
To start off, 2004 Volkswagen Golf is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1990 Toyota Lite Ace. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1990 Toyota Lite Ace would be higher. At 1,984 cc (4 cylinders), 2004 Volkswagen Golf is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Volkswagen Golf weights approximately 291 kg more than 1990 Toyota Lite Ace.
Because 1990 Toyota Lite Ace is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1990 Toyota Lite Ace. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Volkswagen Golf, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1990 Toyota Lite Ace | 2004 Volkswagen Golf | |
| Make | Toyota | Volkswagen |
| Model | Lite Ace | Golf |
| Year Released | 1990 | 2004 |
| Engine Size | 1453 cc | 1984 cc |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 105 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1104 kg | 1395 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4010 mm | 4210 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1770 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1910 mm | 1590 mm |
