1990 Volkswagen Passat vs. 1963 Zastava 1300
To start off, 1990 Volkswagen Passat is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Zastava 1300. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Zastava 1300 would be higher. At 1,595 cc (4 cylinders), 1990 Volkswagen Passat is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1963 Zastava 1300 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1963 Zastava 1300. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1990 Volkswagen Passat, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1990 Volkswagen Passat | 1963 Zastava 1300 | |
Make | Volkswagen | Zastava |
Model | Passat | 1300 |
Year Released | 1990 | 1963 |
Engine Size | 1595 cc | 1295 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 53 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 1550 mm |