1990 Volvo 960 vs. 2008 Acura CSX
To start off, 2008 Acura CSX is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1990 Volvo 960. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1990 Volvo 960 would be higher. At 2,383 cc (6 cylinders), 1990 Volvo 960 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Acura CSX (197 HP) has 77 more horse power than 1990 Volvo 960. (120 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2008 Acura CSX should accelerate faster than 1990 Volvo 960. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1990 Volvo 960 weights approximately 237 kg more than 2008 Acura CSX.
Because 1990 Volvo 960 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1990 Volvo 960. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Acura CSX, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1990 Volvo 960 | 2008 Acura CSX | |
Make | Volvo | Acura |
Model | 960 | CSX |
Year Released | 1990 | 2008 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2383 cc | 2000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 120 HP | 197 HP |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1550 kg | 1313 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4880 mm | 4544 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1752 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1435 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2780 mm | 2700 mm |