1991 Alfa Romeo 164 vs. 1955 Ford 12 M
To start off, 1991 Alfa Romeo 164 is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 Ford 12 M. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 Ford 12 M would be higher. At 1,996 cc (6 cylinders), 1991 Alfa Romeo 164 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1991 Alfa Romeo 164 (207 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 170 more horse power than 1955 Ford 12 M. (37 HP @ 4250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1991 Alfa Romeo 164 should accelerate faster than 1955 Ford 12 M.
Because 1955 Ford 12 M is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1955 Ford 12 M. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1991 Alfa Romeo 164, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1991 Alfa Romeo 164 | 1955 Ford 12 M | |
| Make | Alfa Romeo | Ford |
| Model | 164 | 12 M |
| Year Released | 1991 | 1955 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1996 cc | 1172 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 207 HP | 37 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4250 RPM |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Length | 4560 mm | 4070 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1590 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1560 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2670 mm | 2500 mm |
