1991 Alfa Romeo 164 vs. 1959 DAF 600
To start off, 1991 Alfa Romeo 164 is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 DAF 600. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 DAF 600 would be higher. At 1,996 cc (6 cylinders), 1991 Alfa Romeo 164 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1991 Alfa Romeo 164 (207 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 188 more horse power than 1959 DAF 600. (19 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1991 Alfa Romeo 164 should accelerate faster than 1959 DAF 600. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1991 Alfa Romeo 164 weights approximately 810 kg more than 1959 DAF 600. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1959 DAF 600 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1959 DAF 600. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1991 Alfa Romeo 164, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1991 Alfa Romeo 164 (289 Nm @ 2750 RPM) has 244 more torque (in Nm) than 1959 DAF 600. (45 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 1991 Alfa Romeo 164 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1959 DAF 600.
Compare all specifications:
1991 Alfa Romeo 164 | 1959 DAF 600 | |
Make | Alfa Romeo | DAF |
Model | 164 | 600 |
Year Released | 1991 | 1959 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1996 cc | 590 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 2 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 207 HP | 19 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 289 Nm | 45 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2750 RPM | 2500 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 80 mm | 76 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 66.2 mm | 65 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.0:1 | 7.1:1 |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1440 kg | 630 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4560 mm | 3610 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1450 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1380 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2670 mm | 2060 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 70 L | 28 L |