1991 Alfa Romeo 33 vs. 1963 Cadillac 62
To start off, 1991 Alfa Romeo 33 is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 6,390 cc (8 cylinders), 1963 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1963 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 1155 kg more than 1991 Alfa Romeo 33.
Because 1963 Cadillac 62 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1963 Cadillac 62. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1991 Alfa Romeo 33, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1991 Alfa Romeo 33 | 1963 Cadillac 62 | |
| Make | Alfa Romeo | Cadillac |
| Model | 33 | 62 |
| Year Released | 1991 | 1963 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1351 cc | 6390 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 87 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 985 kg | 2140 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4210 mm | 5670 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1370 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2480 mm | 3300 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 50 L | 79 L |
