1991 Alfa Romeo Proteo vs. 1959 Cadillac 62
To start off, 1991 Alfa Romeo Proteo is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 6,382 cc (8 cylinders), 1959 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1991 Alfa Romeo Proteo (256 HP @ 7200 RPM) has 59 more horse power than 1959 Cadillac 62. (197 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1991 Alfa Romeo Proteo should accelerate faster than 1959 Cadillac 62. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1959 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 655 kg more than 1991 Alfa Romeo Proteo.
1959 Cadillac 62 has automatic transmission and 1991 Alfa Romeo Proteo has manual transmission. 1991 Alfa Romeo Proteo will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1959 Cadillac 62 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1991 Alfa Romeo Proteo | 1959 Cadillac 62 | |
| Make | Alfa Romeo | Cadillac |
| Model | Proteo | 62 |
| Year Released | 1991 | 1959 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2959 cc | 6382 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 256 HP | 197 HP |
| Engine RPM | 7200 RPM | 4800 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1470 kg | 2125 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4150 mm | 5730 mm |
