1991 Alfa Romeo Proteo vs. 1960 Cadillac 62
To start off, 1991 Alfa Romeo Proteo is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 6,390 cc (8 cylinders), 1960 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1991 Alfa Romeo Proteo (256 HP @ 7200 RPM) has 59 more horse power than 1960 Cadillac 62. (197 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1991 Alfa Romeo Proteo should accelerate faster than 1960 Cadillac 62. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1960 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 730 kg more than 1991 Alfa Romeo Proteo.
Because 1991 Alfa Romeo Proteo is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1960 Cadillac 62. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1991 Alfa Romeo Proteo will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1991 Alfa Romeo Proteo | 1960 Cadillac 62 | |
| Make | Alfa Romeo | Cadillac |
| Model | Proteo | 62 |
| Year Released | 1991 | 1960 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2959 cc | 6390 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 256 HP | 197 HP |
| Engine RPM | 7200 RPM | 4800 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1470 kg | 2200 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4150 mm | 5730 mm |
