1991 Alfa Romeo Proteo vs. 1962 Volvo 120
To start off, 1991 Alfa Romeo Proteo is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Volvo 120. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Volvo 120 would be higher. At 2,959 cc (6 cylinders), 1991 Alfa Romeo Proteo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1991 Alfa Romeo Proteo (256 HP @ 7200 RPM) has 175 more horse power than 1962 Volvo 120. (81 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1991 Alfa Romeo Proteo should accelerate faster than 1962 Volvo 120. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1991 Alfa Romeo Proteo weights approximately 460 kg more than 1962 Volvo 120. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1991 Alfa Romeo Proteo is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1962 Volvo 120. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1991 Alfa Romeo Proteo will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1991 Alfa Romeo Proteo | 1962 Volvo 120 | |
Make | Alfa Romeo | Volvo |
Model | Proteo | 120 |
Year Released | 1991 | 1962 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2959 cc | 1778 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 256 HP | 81 HP |
Engine RPM | 7200 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 93.1 mm | 84.2 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 72.6 mm | 80 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1470 kg | 1010 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4150 mm | 4460 mm |