1991 Alfa Romeo Proteo vs. 1965 Ford Mustang
To start off, 1991 Alfa Romeo Proteo is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Ford Mustang. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Ford Mustang would be higher. At 4,261 cc (8 cylinders), 1965 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1991 Alfa Romeo Proteo (256 HP @ 7200 RPM) has 93 more horse power than 1965 Ford Mustang. (163 HP @ 4400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1991 Alfa Romeo Proteo should accelerate faster than 1965 Ford Mustang. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1991 Alfa Romeo Proteo weights approximately 354 kg more than 1965 Ford Mustang. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1991 Alfa Romeo Proteo is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1965 Ford Mustang. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1991 Alfa Romeo Proteo will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1991 Alfa Romeo Proteo | 1965 Ford Mustang | |
| Make | Alfa Romeo | Ford |
| Model | Proteo | Mustang |
| Year Released | 1991 | 1965 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2959 cc | 4261 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 256 HP | 163 HP |
| Engine RPM | 7200 RPM | 4400 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1470 kg | 1116 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4150 mm | 4620 mm |
