1991 Alfa Romeo Proteo vs. 1982 Chevrolet Camaro
To start off, 1991 Alfa Romeo Proteo is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Chevrolet Camaro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Chevrolet Camaro would be higher. At 4,995 cc (8 cylinders), 1982 Chevrolet Camaro is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1991 Alfa Romeo Proteo (256 HP @ 7200 RPM) has 93 more horse power than 1982 Chevrolet Camaro. (163 HP @ 4200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1991 Alfa Romeo Proteo should accelerate faster than 1982 Chevrolet Camaro.
Because 1991 Alfa Romeo Proteo is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1982 Chevrolet Camaro. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1991 Alfa Romeo Proteo will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1991 Alfa Romeo Proteo | 1982 Chevrolet Camaro | |
| Make | Alfa Romeo | Chevrolet |
| Model | Proteo | Camaro |
| Year Released | 1991 | 1982 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2959 cc | 4995 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 256 HP | 163 HP |
| Engine RPM | 7200 RPM | 4200 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 93.1 mm | 94.9 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 72.6 mm | 88.4 mm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4150 mm | 4880 mm |
