1991 Alfa Romeo Proteo vs. 1986 BMW M6
To start off, 1991 Alfa Romeo Proteo is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 BMW M6. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 BMW M6 would be higher. At 3,453 cc (6 cylinders), 1986 BMW M6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1986 BMW M6 (282 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 26 more horse power than 1991 Alfa Romeo Proteo. (256 HP @ 7200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1986 BMW M6 should accelerate faster than 1991 Alfa Romeo Proteo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1986 BMW M6 weights approximately 35 kg more than 1991 Alfa Romeo Proteo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1991 Alfa Romeo Proteo is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1986 BMW M6. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1991 Alfa Romeo Proteo will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1991 Alfa Romeo Proteo | 1986 BMW M6 | |
Make | Alfa Romeo | BMW |
Model | Proteo | M6 |
Year Released | 1991 | 1986 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2959 cc | 3453 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 256 HP | 282 HP |
Engine RPM | 7200 RPM | 6500 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 93.1 mm | 93.4 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 72.6 mm | 84 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1470 kg | 1505 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4150 mm | 4760 mm |