1991 Alfa Romeo Proteo vs. 1996 Mitsubishi FTO
To start off, 1996 Mitsubishi FTO is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1991 Alfa Romeo Proteo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1991 Alfa Romeo Proteo would be higher. At 2,959 cc (6 cylinders), 1991 Alfa Romeo Proteo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1991 Alfa Romeo Proteo (256 HP) has 61 more horse power than 1996 Mitsubishi FTO. (195 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1991 Alfa Romeo Proteo should accelerate faster than 1996 Mitsubishi FTO.
Because 1991 Alfa Romeo Proteo is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1996 Mitsubishi FTO. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1991 Alfa Romeo Proteo will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1996 Mitsubishi FTO has automatic transmission and 1991 Alfa Romeo Proteo has manual transmission. 1991 Alfa Romeo Proteo will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1996 Mitsubishi FTO will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1991 Alfa Romeo Proteo | 1996 Mitsubishi FTO | |
| Make | Alfa Romeo | Mitsubishi |
| Model | Proteo | FTO |
| Year Released | 1991 | 1996 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2959 cc | 1998 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 256 HP | 195 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4150 mm | 4320 mm |
