1991 Alfa Romeo Proteo vs. 2000 Chevrolet Camaro
To start off, 2000 Chevrolet Camaro is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1991 Alfa Romeo Proteo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1991 Alfa Romeo Proteo would be higher. At 5,670 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 Chevrolet Camaro is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1991 Alfa Romeo Proteo weights approximately 282 kg more than 2000 Chevrolet Camaro.
Because 1991 Alfa Romeo Proteo is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2000 Chevrolet Camaro. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1991 Alfa Romeo Proteo will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1991 Alfa Romeo Proteo | 2000 Chevrolet Camaro | |
Make | Alfa Romeo | Chevrolet |
Model | Proteo | Camaro |
Year Released | 1991 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2959 cc | 5670 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 256 HP | 0 HP |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1470 kg | 1188 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4150 mm | 4910 mm |